On 3/29/07, John Tromp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/29/07, Weston Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/29/07, John Tromp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/29/07, Weston Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It appears to me that at least 91 is possible:
> > Nice! If you use O's instead like
> >
> > .OO.O.OO.
> > OO.OOO.OO
> > .OO.O.OO.
> > OO.OOO.OO
> > .OO.O.OO.
> > OO.OOO.OO
> > .OO.O.OO.
> > OO.OOO.OO
> > .OOO.OOO.
> >
> > it looks pretty artistic, like a vase with a flower inside:-)
>
> :)
>
> It appears that you can get 92 as well, by replacing the two empty
> intersections along the upper edge of my diagram with a single one in
> the center of that edge, and placing an empty intersection on one of
> the other intersections along the central line of symmetry.
If it weren't for the fact that that central line is needed to keep
everything connected:-)
Yes, I realized that later (as soon as I tried to draw it) but didn't
bother to post anything, since Gunnar had already posted that 91 is
the best possible. But thanks for pointing it out. :)
Weston
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
