John, Did that 107.3 number come from me? I seem to remember that I used to get that - if I'm remembering correctly.
But I remember making a little change, that addressed what appeared to be a minor implementation bug. One of the speed enhancements is to "put away" moves you already tried which occupy points on the board. When a capture is made I would bring these back into play. But the bug was that I was putting away the moves that filled the 1 point eyes, even though they might be legal on the next move or later. However they would all come back to life when a capture was made. I don't think this bug had a huge affect on the quality of the play. But apparently, it did add about 3 moves to the length of the play-outs. So I think the more correct number is what I just reported on the previous email, very close to about 104.63. I am now curious about what others are getting. - Don On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 22:33 -0400, John Tromp wrote: > I've seen the number 107.3... reported earlier > for the average length, without the 2 final passes. > Is this allowing multi stone suicides or not? > And what's the outcome in the other case? > Thanks! > > > regards, > -John > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
