On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 18:31 +0000, alain Baeckeroot wrote: > Le jeudi 22 février 2007 17:00, Don Dailey a écrit : > > It appears that at 9x9 Lazarus needs more play-outs to equalize with > > gnugo. However, it also appears that at higher levels the superiority > > is even greater than in the 7x7 games. This is non-intuitive and > > probably not really the case - I assume this is due to sampling error > > since fewer games have been played on this boardsize. We also need to > > see the highest level lose a few games as this surely distorts the > > table significantly (you cannot get an accurate ELO rating if you don't > > win AND lose some games.) > > > > I may try 11x11 or 13x13 boards at a later time - focusing on lower > > levels since the longer levels are very time consuming. I will post > > an update to this in a few days once I've gathered substantially more > > data. > > > Thanks for sharing your experiments. > btw, GNU Go have databases for joseki and fuseki on 9X9 and 13x13. > Maybe running with --nojosekidb --nofusekidb otpions would be better for > scale comparison.
Oh now you tell me!!! Will gnugo play deterministically without the joseki? It's probably ok in either case - since Lazarus is MC it provides plenty of variety but I think I prefer seeing gnugo vary a little. By the way, I'm running everything at the default with GNU Go for this test. > Alain _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
