On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 14:08 -0600, Matt Gokey wrote: > Don, do you have any theories or information about why this is the > case?
Not really. In truth the only thing that matters is to increase your winning percentage - not your score. There seems to be no point in tampering with this. - Don > I would think either way the algorithm should always prefer higher > average win probabilities, but faced with alternatives where the win > probabilities are same or nearly the same but the average winning > margins are higher for one alternative, wouldn't it be better to take > the path with the better margin? I mean it may in fact be wrong about > the win/loss classifications so choosing the better scores would seem > to > make sense within reason as long as it's not greedy. > > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
