the thing about blunders is that frequently one player making ablunder causes the other player to make one as well. For instance if one player plays somewhere that can be ignored. Frequently the other player will not ignore it. BOth are making blunders relative to perfect strategy but it is very common. And many times a sequence will be played out like this with lots of the traded moves being blunders. It is however more reasonable to look at the choice to follow a sequence as the blunder and the choice of the opponent to play it out a blunder. That is 2 blunders not 30 if the sequence is 30 moves. In my opinion atleast.
- Nick On 1/21/07, Ray Tayek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 03:43 AM 1/21/2007, you wrote: >----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- >Van: Ray Tayek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Datum: zondag, januari 21, 2007 4:18 am >Onderwerp: Re: [computer-go] an idea for a new measure of a computer go > program's rank. > > > > also i suspect that at least 33% of the moves (at my 1-dan level) > > are > > wrong (what you might call in chess a "blunder"?). > > > > what do other people of different strengths think about this 33%? > > > >I don't know the percentage of blunders. It also depends on what you >call a blunder. Is a 1 point mistake a blunder? no, maybe 10 or more points thanks --- vice-chair http://ocjug.org/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
