in absolute terms, the time issue doesn't matter until
some piece of code is good enough to beat a dan-level
player on a 19x19 board at *any* physically realistic time
constraint. which hasn't yet been demonstrated.  the super
slow motion tournament would be a good way for us to notice
when this happens.

(i.e when program X can give program Y 9 stones when
program Y has a 30 minute time limit and program X has
a 24 hour time limit, and they're normally much closer in
strength when they both play at 30 minute time limits).

as an example, if any program could give gnugo 9 stones
under these circumstances, it might be good evidence
that we're within a factor of 50x in speed of being capable
of beating a 1d player.

s.

----- Original Message ----
From: Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:24:38 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Gnugo vs commercial programs

Chrilly,

The computer go guys don't think of performance as a function of time,
only as a kind of absolute, it plays good or it doesn't.   

Us computer chess people are used to thinking of it as a function of
how fast the computer is and how much memory (along with how well the
code is written of course.)

The UCT programs, assuming they are properly coded and bug free, all
play
perfectly,   but what really counts is how well they play given some
time constraint.   Again, most of the computer GO people do not think
in 
those terms.

It's very encouraging to me that Hiroshi reported the thinking times,
I think he understands that it is relevant.

- Don




 
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 21:01 +0100, Chrilly wrote:
> You must test with Gnu-Go level 16.. This is according to Stefan Mertin by 
> far the best mode. But it takes sometimes quite a long time till Gnu-Go 
> makes it move.
> In your experiments Gun-Go played very fast. You played fast Blitz and 
> Gnu-Go had a big time handicap (besides Handtalk, which plays Ultra-Blitz).
> 
> Chrilly
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Hiroshi Yamashita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "computer-go" <computer-go@computer-go.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 6:10 PM
> Subject: [computer-go] Gnugo vs commercial programs
> 
> 
> >I tested Gnugo against some commercial programs.
> >
> > Gnugo is 3.7.10.
> > Level is default with --never-resign and --komi 6.5 option.
> > Commercial program is max level.
> >
> > All game is Japanese rule and komi is 6.5.
> >
> >                     gnugo wins losses   winning rate   average score
> > GinseiIgo5      (KCC Igo )  11    55       0.17         -31.3 points
> > Saikouhou3      (Haruka  )  13    44       0.23         -41.4 points
> > TuyoiIgo4       (Go4++   )  27    54       0.33         -11.4 points
> > ShudanTaikyoku3 (Handtalk)  29    37       0.44         - 4.5 points
> >
> >
> > GinseiIgo5      ... KCC Igo,  published in 2004.
> > Saikouhou3      ... Haruka,   published in 2002. Latest version.
> > TuyoiIgo4       ... Go4++,    published in 2003. Engine is 2002 version.
> > ShudanTaikyoku3 ... Handtalk, published in 1999.
> >
> > These are not latest version except Haruka.
> > All game records are here.
> > http://www.yss-aya.com/gnugo_vs_result.zip
> >
> > Average expended hours.
> > KCC      17m51s  Gnugo 3m14s, Opteron248(2.2GHz)
> > Haruka   11m53s  Gnugo 4m28s, Opteron248(2.2GHz) + AthlonXP 2100+(1.73GHz)
> > Go4++     4m59s  Gnugo 2m18s, Opteron248(2.2GHz)
> > Handtalk  2m42s  Gnugo 5m22s, AthlonXP 2100+(1.73GHz)
> >
> >
> > Appendix.
> >
> > GnuGo 3.5.4 (January, 2004 version) test result. Level is default.
> >
> >                     gnugo wins losses   winning rate   average score
> > ValueIgo3       (KCC Igo  )   4    26       0.13         -36.6 points
> > TuyoiIgo4       (Go4++    )  11    19       0.37          -6.5 points
> > ShudanTaikyoku3 (Handtalk )  12    18       0.40          -3.8 points
> > AI Igo2004      (ManyFaces)  18    12       0.60         +11.7 points
> >
> > ValueIgo3      ... KCC Igo,   published in 2003. same GinseiIgo2PW(2001?)
> > AI Igo2004     ... ManyFaces, published in 2003. engine is 2003?
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiroshi Yamashita
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > computer-go mailing list
> > computer-go@computer-go.org
> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to