> > I think I disagree > > with the statement "an evaluation that only > > understands final scores will not > > make a strong go program" depending on what you mean > > by random. > > here i will interject by agreeing with the > statement that "an evaluation that only > understands final scores will not make a > strong go program".
> if (and perhaps no such go programs exist) one > were to construct a go program that simply > evaluated moves based upon the percentage of > completely-played-out randomly chosen games In fact, I think we say the same thing, simply using different meaning for the same word. By "random" you mean "uniformly random", and I don't mean that, I simply mean random (in the sense of random variable). Sylvain _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
