Thanks for the votes.

With 5 +1 binding votes (my +1 included), this is concluded. I'll go ahead
publish the artifacts.

On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 3:39 AM Sammi Chen via common-dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (Binding)
>
> I've verified following items:
> * Download links are valid
> * Verified signatures and checksums
> * Reviewed documents
> * Verified LICENSE and NOTICE files
> * Successfully compiled hadoop-thirdparty 1.6.0-RC1 source
> * Successfully compiled hadoop trunk with 1.6.0-RC1
>
> Thanks Wei-Chiu for carrying on the release.
>
> Sammi
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2026 at 13:58, Rakesh Radhakrishnan via common-dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (Binding)
> >
> > I've verified following items:
> > * Verified signatures and checksums
> > * Download links are valid
> > * Reviewed documents
> > * Successfully compiled hadoop trunk with 1.6.0-RC1 with java
> > version 1.8.0_472
> > * Verified LICENSE and NOTICE files
> >
> > Thanks Wei-Chiu for the efforts. Good Luck!
> >
> > Best,
> > Rakesh
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 12:01 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hadoop community,
> > >
> > > I'd like to initiate a vote on the release candidate hadoop-thirdparty
> > > 1.6.0 RC1. Note that Steve initiated 1.6.0 RC0, but it never materize,
> so
> > > here I'm to pick from RC0 with one additional commit to update guava to
> > > 33.7.2-jre
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/releases/tag/release-1.6.0-RC1
> > >
> > > JIRAs included:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HADOOP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20thirdparty-1.6.0
> > >
> > > Artifacts:
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/hadoop-thirdparty-1.6.0-RC1/
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this candidate as Apache Hadoop Thirdparty
> > 1.6.0.
> > > The vote will remain open for three days per ASF policy.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package
> > > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release (please explain why)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Weichiu
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to