Thanks all for your positive feedback, I will try to launch another official vote thread for a while. Thanks again.
Best Regards, - He Xiaoqiao On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 3:19 AM Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 to close long pending PRs. > > I agree if the author is still interested to make progress the author can > always reopen. > > Regards, > Uma > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 7:15 AM Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Aug 29, 2025, at 8:08 AM, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I don't really have a vote here, but I've been attempting to mentor > some > > folks on how to get engaged and the PR backlog is very daunting, and > > signals that their contributions will get lost in the noise. So I'm in > > favor of this. I recognize that it will cause some active PRs to be > closed, > > but this is a one-way door. > > > > Sorry, this is *NOT* a one-way door. Ie, easily reversed for tickets/PRs > > that people still care about. > > > > — > > Rich Bowen > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > >
