hey, we aren't to touch distcp. everyone uses that. good to know of the other two
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 09:01, Ayush Saxena <ayush...@gmail.com> wrote: > Distcp (I have a use case for it) > Hadoop-federation-balance(RBF uses it, we will take care in case it > bothers) > Hadoop-Dynamometer(This I feel is being used from jira activies) > > So, these three we should let stay as is. > Others the object store ones are active. You know which all are needed. > For rest we can call for a vote and drop them if everyone agrees. > > -Ayush > > > On 31-Mar-2022, at 4:40 PM, Steve Loughran <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > > how many of the modules under hadoop-tools get used/maintained? > > > > hadoop-aliyun > > hadoop-ant > > hadoop-archive-logs > > hadoop-archives > > hadoop-aws > > hadoop-azure > > hadoop-azure-datalake > > hadoop-datajoin > > hadoop-distcp > > hadoop-dynamometer > > hadoop-extras > > hadoop-federation-balance > > hadoop-fs2img > > hadoop-ftp > > hadoop-gridmix > > hadoop-kafka > > hadoop-openstack > > hadoop-ozone > > hadoop-pipes > > hadoop-resourceestimator > > hadoop-rumen > > hadoop-sls > > hadoop-streaming > > > > I know distcp is universal, and the aws. azure, aliyun modules are > > active. hadoop-azure-datalake doesn't get maintenance, but it should stay > > around until microsoft remove the gen1 ADLS service > > > > But what about all the others? the hadoop-openstack one hasn't been > touched > > or tested for a few years, and IMO could be cut immediately. what about > > others? does hadoop-streaming or hadoop-pipes get use any more? > > > > Existing code may use these, but having them in the codebase only creates > > maintenance work, especially if security fixes need to go in on the code > or > > are caused by dependencies. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org > >
