Thanks for all the positive feedback,
I opened INFRA-18777 to request the proposed change. Marton On 7/18/19 10:02 AM, Masatake Iwasaki wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > Masatake Iwasaki > > On 7/17/19 15:07, Elek, Marton wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Github UI (ui!) helps to merge Pull Requests to the proposed branch. >> There are three different ways to do it [1]: >> >> 1. Keep all the different commits from the PR branch and create one >> additional merge commit ("Create a merge commit") >> >> 2. Squash all the commits and commit the change as one patch ("Squash >> and merge") >> >> 3. Keep all the different commits from the PR branch but rebase, merge >> commit will be missing ("Rebase and merge") >> >> >> >> As only the option 2 is compatible with the existing development >> practices of Hadoop (1 issue = 1 patch = 1 commit), I call for a lazy >> consensus vote: If no objections withing 3 days, I will ask INFRA to >> disable the options 1 and 3 to make the process less error prone. >> >> Please let me know, what do you think, >> >> Thanks a lot >> Marton >> >> ps: Personally I prefer to merge from local as it enables to sign the >> commits and do a final build before push. But this is a different story, >> this proposal is only about removing the options which are obviously >> risky... >> >> ps2: You can always do any kind of merge / commits from CLI, for example >> to merge a feature branch together with keeping the history. >> >> [1]: >> https://help.github.com/en/articles/merging-a-pull-request#merging-a-pull-request-on-github >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org