Greg Kinman created HADOOP-16246:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Unbounded thread pool maximum pool size in S3AFileSystem 
TransferManager
                 Key: HADOOP-16246
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16246
             Project: Hadoop Common
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: fs/s3
    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
            Reporter: Greg Kinman


I have something running in production that is running up on {{ulimit}} trying 
to create {{s3a-transfer-unbounded}} threads.

Relevant background: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13826.

Before that change, the thread pool used in the {{TransferManager}} had both a 
reasonably small maximum pool size and work queue capacity.

After that change, the thread pool has both a maximum pool size and work queue 
capacity of {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}}.

This seems like a pretty bad idea, because now we have, practically speaking, 
no bound on the number of threads that might get created. I understand the 
change was made in response to experiencing deadlocks and at the warning of the 
documentation, which I will repeat here:
{quote}It is not recommended to use a single threaded executor or a thread pool 
with a bounded work queue as control tasks may submit subtasks that can't 
complete until all sub tasks complete. Using an incorrectly configured thread 
pool may cause a deadlock (I.E. the work queue is filled with control tasks 
that can't finish until subtasks complete but subtasks can't execute because 
the queue is filled).
{quote}
The documentation only warns against having a bounded _work queue_, not against 
having a bounded _maximum pool size_. And this seems fine, as having an 
unbounded work queue sounds ok. Having an unbounded maximum pool size, however, 
does not.

I will also note that this constructor is now deprecated and suggests using 
{{TransferManagerBuilder}} instead, which by default creates a fixed thread 
pool of size 10: 
[https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java/blob/1.11.534/aws-java-sdk-s3/src/main/java/com/amazonaws/services/s3/transfer/internal/TransferManagerUtils.java#L59].

I suggest we make a small change here and keep the maximum pool size at 
{{maxThreads}}, which defaults to 10, while keeping the work queue as is 
(unbounded).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to