Thank you for the votes, everyone - we have surpassed the required number. If anyone would like time to review this further this weekend, let me know and I'll hold off. Otherwise I don't see a reason to wait, and I'll perform the merge before Monday.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:15 PM Aaron Fabbri <fab...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 (Binding). Haven't thoroughly reviewed all the new code but > successfully ran all the integration and unit tests today. Based on the > progress this looks ready to merge. Good work folks. > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:19 PM John Zhuge <john.zh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (Binding) Nice effort all around. >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:45 AM Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com> >> wrote: >> >> > +1 (Binding) >> > >> > Ive been testing this; the current branch is rebased to trunk and all >> the >> > new tests are happy. >> > >> > >> > the connector is as good as any of the connectors get before they are >> > ready for people to play with: there are always surprises in the wild, >> > usually network and configuration —those we have to wait and see what >> > happens, >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On 18 Sep 2018, at 04:10, Sean Mackrory <mackror...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > All, >> > > >> > > I would like to propose that HADOOP-15407 be merged to trunk. As >> > described >> > > in that JIRA, this is a complete reimplementation of the current >> > > hadoop-azure storage driver (WASB) with some significant advantages. >> The >> > > impact outside of that module is very limited, however, and it appears >> > that >> > > on-going improvements will continue to be so. The tests have been >> stable >> > > for some time, and I believe we've reached the point of being ready >> for >> > > broader feedback and to continue incremental improvements in trunk. >> > > HADOOP-15407 was rebased on trunk today and I had a successful test >> run. >> > > >> > > I'd like to call out the contributions of Thomas Marquardt, Da Zhou, >> and >> > Steve >> > > Loughran who have all contributed significantly to getting this >> branch to >> > > its current state. Numerous other developers are named in the commit >> log >> > > and the JIRA. >> > > >> > > I'll start us off: >> > > >> > > +1 (binding) >> > >> > >> >> -- >> John >> >
