I'm an =0 I'm afraid I think those extra files need to be pulled which triggers a repackage, at which point there's a couple of
HADOOP-14205 No FileSystem for scheme: adl HADOOP-14204 S3A multipart commit failing, of the two, the ADL FS one is the most significant, though if there was going to be a re-roll, I'd like them in. I also worry about windows test coverage, as irrespective of whether people are planning to run it on a windows host in production, the hadoop libs get used client side in job submit, and more now in Spark . HADOOP-14201 showed up that (a) my new VM is a mess, so complicating testing and (b) gzip was failing. I Worry about gzip, as that could be a sign of native lib problems.. someone needs to look at it a bit more. However, I don't think it should really be a blocker, given the ASF doesn't officially redistribute windows binaries. so: some issues with packaging and a couple of patches which need to go in. Test coverage on windows is potentially longer, and I don't want it to hold things up. Anyhow: =0. If everyone else is happy to ship, then let's get it out the door, as that's the only way that we'll get all the in-the-field bugreps coming back in. We will need to release some new versions in the coming weeks to handle those -Steve > On 21 Mar 2017, at 18:43, Haibo Chen <haiboc...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Thanks Junping for working on the new release! > > +1 non-binding > > 1) Downloaded the source, verified the checksum > 2) Built natively from source, and deployed it to a pseudo-distributed > cluster > 3) Ran sleep and teragen job and checked both YARN and JHS web UI > 4) Played with yarn + mapreduce command lines > > Best, > Haibo Chen > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >> ?Thanks for update, John. Then we should be OK with fixing this issue in >> 2.8.1. >> >> Mark the target version of HADOOP-14205 to 2.8.1 instead of 2.8.0 and bump >> up to blocker in case we could miss this in releasing 2.8.1. :) >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Junping >> >> ________________________________ >> From: John Zhuge <jzh...@cloudera.com> >> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:31 AM >> To: Junping Du >> Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; >> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3) >> >> Yes, it only affects ADL. There is a workaround of adding these 2 >> properties to core-site.xml: >> >> <property> >> <name>fs.adl.impl</name> >> <value>org.apache.hadoop.fs.adl.AdlFileSystem</value> >> </property> >> >> <property> >> <name>fs.AbstractFileSystem.adl.impl</name> >> <value>org.apache.hadoop.fs.adl.Adl</value> >> </property> >> >> I have the initial patch ready but hitting these live unit test failures: >> >> Failed tests: >> >> TestAdlFileSystemContractLive.runTest:60->FileSystemContractBaseTest.testListStatus:257 >> expected:<1> but was:<10> >> >> Tests in error: >> TestAdlFileContextMainOperationsLive>FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest. >> testMkdirsFailsForSubdirectoryOfExistingFile:254 » AccessControl >> TestAdlFileSystemContractLive.runTest:60->FileSystemContractBaseTest. >> testMkdirsFailsForSubdirectoryOfExistingFile:190 » AccessControl >> >> >> Stay tuned... >> >> John Zhuge >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com<mailto: >> j...@hortonworks.com>> wrote: >> >> Thank you for reporting the issue, John! Does this issue only affect ADL >> (Azure Data Lake) which is a new feature for 2.8 rather than other existing >> FS? If so, I think we can leave the fix to 2.8.1 to fix given this is not a >> regression and just a new feature get broken.? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Junping >> >> ________________________________ >> From: John Zhuge <jzh...@cloudera.com<mailto:jzh...@cloudera.com>> >> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 9:07 AM >> To: Junping Du >> Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; >> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org>; >> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org>; >> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3) >> >> Discovered https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14205 "No >> FileSystem for scheme: adl". >> >> The issue were caused by backporting HADOOP-13037 to branch-2 and earlier. >> HADOOP-12666 should not be backported, but some changes are needed: >> property fs.adl.impl in core-default.xml and hadoop-tools-dist/pom.xml. >> >> I am working on a patch. >> >> >> John Zhuge >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com<mailto:jd >> u...@hortonworks.com>> wrote: >> Hi all, >> With fix of HDFS-11431 get in, I've created a new release candidate >> (RC3) for Apache Hadoop 2.8.0. >> >> This is the next minor release to follow up 2.7.0 which has been >> released for more than 1 year. It comprises 2,900+ fixes, improvements, and >> new features. Most of these commits are released for the first time in >> branch-2. >> >> More information about the 2.8.0 release plan can be found here: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+2.8+Release >> >> New RC is available at: http://home.apache.org/~ >> junping_du/hadoop-2.8.0-RC3 >> >> The RC tag in git is: release-2.8.0-RC3, and the latest commit id >> is: 91f2b7a13d1e97be65db92ddabc627cc29ac0009 >> >> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org<http:// >> repository.apache.org> at: https://repository.apache.org/ >> content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1057 >> >> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 >> days, ending on 03/22/2017 PDT time. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Junping >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
