+1, could you structure the source tree/build so that adding new modules is easy?
> On 10 Jul 2015, at 06:08, Kengo Seki <sek...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for Yetus. Simple and distinctive. > > On Friday, July 10, 2015, Kengo Seki <sek...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 8, 2015, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','oz...@apache.org');>> wrote: >> >>> Hi Sean, >>> >>> +1 for Yetus since it sounds good name to me. >>> >>> Thanks >>> - Tsuyoshi >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>>> Hi folks! >>>> >>>> It's almost time for the July board meeting, so we need to get the ball >>>> rolling on the proposal for a new TLP focused on QA[1]. >>>> >>>> Once issue outstanding from the original discussion is consensus on a >>> name. >>>> We need to get some consensus together so that I can start verifying >>> that >>>> the name is usable for an ASF project via a podling name search jira >>> [2]. >>>> >>>> A brief review, so far the only stated naming preferences are Allen W's >>>> desire for something shell related and my desire for a project name >>>> beginning with the letter Y. >>>> >>>> We have a proposed name of Yetus; it's an archaic genus of sea snail and >>>> from my initial review should be usable. >>>> >>>> Any other strong feelings on naming? Any specific objections to Yetus? >>>> >>>> [1]: http://s.apache.org/yetus-discuss-hadoop >>>> [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sean >>> >>
