If 2.7 is being positioned as the JDK7-only release, then it would be good
to know how 2.8 lines up in terms of timing. Our interest is landing the
shared cache feature (YARN-1492)... Thanks.

Sangjin

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Thanks for starting this thread, Arun.
>
> Your proposal seems reasonable to me. I suppose we would like new features
> and improvements to go into 2.8 then? If yes, what time frame are we
> looking at for 2.8? Looking at YARN, it would be nice to get a release with
> shared-cache and a stable version of reservation work. I believe they are
> well under way and should be ready in a few weeks.
>
> Regarding 2.7 release specifics, do you plan to create a branch off of
> current branch-2.6 and update all issues marked fixed for 2.7 to be fixed
> for 2.8?
>
> Thanks
> Karthik
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Arun Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > With hadoop-2.6 out it's time to think ahead.
> >
> > As we've discussed in the past, 2.6 was the last release which supports
> > JDK6.
> >
> > I'm thinking it's best to try get 2.7 out in a few weeks (maybe by the
> > holidays) with just the switch to JDK7 (HADOOP-10530) and possibly
> > support for JDK-1.8 (as a runtime) via HADOOP-11090.
> >
> > This way we can start with the stable base of 2.6 and switch over to
> > JDK7 to allow our downstream projects to use either for a short time
> > (hadoop-2.6 or hadoop-2.7).
> >
> > I'll update the Roadmap wiki accordingly.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Arun
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>

Reply via email to