On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Agree 2.3 is now very stale. > > So, as I understand, your motivation is to get HDFS-2832 & HDFS-4949 out, > correct? > > If so, that could be a better option - I can abandon the 2.3rc, and then > release current branch-2 as 2.3. Would that be better? > > Arun Assuming HDFS-2832 and HDFS-4949 are ready, this makes sense. +1. No point in making a stale 2.3 release now and an immediate 2.4 with no difference, and without the WIP YARN features. +Vinod -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
