+1

Thanks,
Mayank


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Arun
>
> On Jan 17, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Zhijie Shen <zs...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > As previously discussed here (
> http://markmail.org/message/iscvp7cedrtvmd6p),
> > I would like to call a vote to merge the YARN-321 branch for Generic
> > Application History Server into trunk.
> >
> > *Scope of the changes*
> >
> >
> > The changes enable ResourceManager to record the historic information of
> > the application, the application attempt and the container in terms of
> > events via a history writer. In addition, the changes setup up an
> > application history server, which allows users to access the recorded
> > information via RPC interface, web UI and REST APIs.
> >
> > *Details of development*
> >
> >
> > - Development of the feature is tracked in the jira -
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-321.
> > - Development has been done in a separate branch -
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/YARN-321.
> > - The feature development involved about 35 subtasks.
> > - The up-to-date design is posted at -
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12619638/Generic
> > Application
> > History - Design-20131219.pdf<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12619638/Generic%C2%A0Application%20History%20-%20Design-20131219.pdf
> >
> >
> > - The uber merge patch Jira -
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1587
> >
> > *Testing*
> >
> >
> > A number of unit tests have been added as a part of the feature. In
> > addition, we’ve also done end-to-end functional tests, and performance
> > tests for HDFS-based history storage and history events processing. Last
> > but not least, we have updated branch YARN-321 against the latest trunk,
> > edited merge conflicts, fixed test failures caused by merge, and
> corrected
> > a bunch of bad source code issues. The uber merge patch that contains all
> > the diff between branch YARN-321 and trunk has been run through Jenkins.
> >
> > *Pending work*
> >
> >
> > - Make it work in secure mode
> > - Pending bug fixes
> >
> > We wish to merge the branch now instead of waiting for later. The main
> > reason for this is that as the branch grew in size, the cost of its
> > maintenance became huge. Once the feature is merged into trunk, we will
> > continue to work on pending work like security stuff, to test and fix any
> > bugs that may be found on the trunk, and to refactor the code about to
> > share some pieces in PRC and web interfaces.
> >
> > *Release status*
> >
> >
> > If the security stuff and the pending fixes arrive by the time everything
> > else planned for Release 2.4 is done, we can include it as well. This is
> > what we are striving for. Otherwise, we will call AHS
> not-feature-complete
> > and not stable.
> >
> > The bulk of the design and implementation was done by Mayank Bansal and
> me
> > with contributions from Devaraj K and Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli amongst
> > others. Also, thanks to Robert Joseph Evans and Sandy Ryza for providing
> > feedback on the design discussions.
> >
> >
> >
> > This vote runs for a week and closes on 1/24/2014 at 11:59 pm PT.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zhijie
> >
> > --
> > Zhijie Shen
> > Hortonworks Inc.
> > http://hortonworks.com/
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Reply via email to