Correct me if I am wrong, but FWIU, we already released a beta with the same 
symlink issues. Given 2.1.1 is just another beta, I believe we can go ahead 
with it and resolve the issues in the final GA release. Instead of resetting 
the testing done by everyone.

It's a hard story to sell but beta phase is supposed to be only about 
bug-fixes, but incompatible changes that cannot be avoided, well cannot be 
avoided.

Thanks,
+Vinod

On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Andrew Wang wrote:

> We still need to resolve some symlink issues; are we planning to spin a new
> RC? Leaving it as-is is not a good option.
> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.1.1-beta that I
>> would like to get
>>> released - this release fixes a number of bugs on top of
>> hadoop-2.1.0-beta as a result of significant amounts of testing.
>>> 
>>> If things go well, this might be the last of the *beta* releases of
>> hadoop-2.x.
>>> 
>>> The RC is available at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.1.1-beta-rc0
>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.1.1-beta-rc0
>>> 
>>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>>> 
>>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
>> 
>> Short of HDFS-5225 from the Bigtop perspective this RC gets a +1.
>> 
>> All tests passed in both secure and unsecure modes in 4 nodes
>> pseudo distributed cluster with all the members of Hadoop
>> ecosystem running smoke tests.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>> 


-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to