REMINDER: VOTING CLOSES TONIGHT AT 10PM.
Happy St. Valentine's Day :-)

--Matt


On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Matt Foley <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi, I peeled open the non-binary tarball (http://people.apache.org/~
> mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/hadoop-1.1.2.tar.gz), and besides the complete
> src/ directory, it has the build.xml file in the root directory, same place
> it is (relative to the src directory) when checked out from SVN.
>
> That is, the build.xml file is one level above the src/ subdirectory, just
> as it needs to be for build-able source.
> So I think this tarball is complete.
>
> Thanks,
> --Matt
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>
>> Hey Matt,
>>
>>   http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
>>
>> A tag is not release artifact, we don't vote on a tag.
>>
>> Yes, http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/hadoop-1.1.2.tar.gz
>> contains sources, but not all, cannot build from that source tree, it
>> does
>> not have the build.xml.
>>
>> I think we should make that src/ dir to be complete so you can build from
>> there. Or, we should have another SRC TARBALL as we do have in Hadoop2
>> which is nothing but the whole (buildable) source.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Matt Foley <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > >> official release artifacts MUST be source artifacts
>> > That's why the release is tagged in SVN source tree.  Nominally, that's
>> > what you're really voting on.  The release artifacts are indeed for the
>> > convenience of reviewers.
>> >
>> > However, the non-binary tarball (
>> > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/hadoop-1.1.2.tar.gz )
>> > includes the "src/" directory, which contains the full Apache sources.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --Matt
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > AFAIK, official release artifacts MUST be source artifacts, binary
>> > > artifacts are convenience ones. The vote should be on source
>> artifacts.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thx
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1 (binding)
>> > > >
>> > > > Looks like your key isn't in the file:
>> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS Could you
>> add
>> > > > it? Signature is good (from pgp.mit.edu) and checksums match. Ran
>> some
>> > > > of the unit tests, looked through the changelog and repo log, looks
>> > > > good.
>> > > >
>> > > > There's a -bin target and another tarball with docs, but I don't
>> see a
>> > > > source tarball. It's useful to have these artifacts available, but
>> > > > technically we're supposed to be approving source code, not
>> builds...
>> > > > -C
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Matt Foley <ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > (resending with modified Subject line for RC5)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hadoop-1.1.2-rc4 is withdrawn.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hadoop-1.1.2-rc5 is available at
>> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/
>> > > > > or in SVN at
>> > > > >
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/tags/release-1.1.2-rc5/
>> > > > > or in the Maven repo.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This candidate for a stabilization release of the Hadoop-1.1
>> branch
>> > has
>> > > > 24
>> > > > > patches and several cleanups compared to the Hadoop-1.1.1 release.
>> > > >  Release
>> > > > > notes are available at
>> > > > >
>> http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/releasenotes.html
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please vote for this as the next release of Hadoop-1.  Voting will
>> > > close
>> > > > > next Thursday, 7 Feb, at 3:00pm PST.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > --Matt
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Chris Nauroth <
>> > > cnaur...@hortonworks.com
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >  HDFS-4423 has been committed to branch-1.  Thank you, Matt.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> --Chris
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Matt Foley <
>> > mfo...@hortonworks.com>
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > Hi Chris,
>> > > > >> > Okay, please get it in as soon as possible, and I'll respin the
>> > > build.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Suresh, can you code review?
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > > >> > --Matt
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Chris Nauroth <
>> > > > >> cnaur...@hortonworks.com
>> > > > >> > >wrote:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > Hello Matt,
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Would it be better to wait for committing the fix of blocker
>> > > > HDFS-4423:
>> > > > >> > > Checkpoint exception causes fatal damage to fsimage?  I have
>> > > > uploaded a
>> > > > >> > > patch, and I expect to receive a code review in the next day
>> or
>> > > two.
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Thank you,
>> > > > >> > > --Chris
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Matt Foley <
>> > > mfo...@hortonworks.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > A new build of Hadoop-1.1.2 is available at
>> > > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc4/
>> > > > >> > > > or in SVN at
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/tags/release-1.1.2-rc4/
>> > > > >> > > > or in the Maven repo.
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > This candidate for a stabilization release of the
>> Hadoop-1.1
>> > > > branch
>> > > > >> has
>> > > > >> > > 23
>> > > > >> > > > patches and several cleanups compared to the Hadoop-1.1.1
>> > > release.
>> > > > >> > >  Release
>> > > > >> > > > notes are available at
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc4/releasenotes.html
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > Please vote for this as the next release of Hadoop-1.
>>  Voting
>> > > will
>> > > > >> > close
>> > > > >> > > > next Monday, 4 Feb, at 3:30pm PST.
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > >> > > > --Matt
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Alejandro
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alejandro
>>
>
>

Reply via email to