Matt,

The scope of this vote seems different from what was discussed in the
PROPOSAL thread.

In the PROPOSAL thread you indicated this was for Hadoop1 because it is ANT
based. And the main reason was to remove saveVersion.sh.

Your #3  was not discussed in the proposal, was it?

It seems this vote is dragging much more stuff it was originally discussed.
I think you should suspend the vote, recap the motivation and then restart
the vote. As things are laid out at the moment my vote is:

-1 (It still seems an overkill to introduce a new runtime requirement for
building to replace a script.)
+1 (I think this is the right way to simplify the build)
-1 (AFAIK there is not such requirement at the moment, and if it comes it
would be in the form of an AM, which I'd argue it should leave outside of
Hadoop)

Thx


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Giridharan Kesavan <
gkesa...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> +1, +1, +1
>
> -Giri
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Matt Foley <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > For discussion, please see previous thread "[PROPOSAL] introduce Python
> as
> > build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop
> stack".
> >
> > This vote consists of three separate items:
> >
> > 1. Contributors shall be allowed to use Python as a platform-independent
> > scripting language for build-time tasks, and add Python as a build-time
> > dependency.
> > Please vote +1, 0, -1.
> >
> > 2. Contributors shall be encouraged to use Maven tasks in combination
> with
> > either plug-ins or Groovy scripts to do cross-platform build-time tasks,
> > even under ant in Hadoop-1.
> > Please vote +1, 0, -1.
> >
> > 3. Contributors shall be allowed to use Python as a platform-independent
> > scripting language for run-time tasks, and add Python as a run-time
> > dependency.
> > Please vote +1, 0, -1.
> >
> > Note that voting -1 on #1 and +1 on #2 essentially REQUIRES contributors
> to
> > use Maven plug-ins or Groovy as the only means of cross-platform
> build-time
> > tasks, or to simply continue using platform-dependent scripts as is being
> > done today.
> >
> > Vote closes at 12:30pm PST on Saturday 1 December.
> > ---------
> > Personally, my vote is +1, +1, +1.
> > I think #2 is preferable to #1, but still has many unknowns in it, and
> > until those are worked out I don't want to delay moving to cross-platform
> > scripts for build-time tasks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --Matt
> >
>



-- 
Alejandro

Reply via email to