HI Bhavesh Shah,

I didn't know how to answer your query due to many reasons. But, look your
problem in this way, instead of starting the multiple thrift servers and
running a query on multiple thrift servers, it is good approach,  but, if
we do this, then my question is: "you want execute multiple queries
parallel, then, How did you combine the out puts if you want to use the out
put of one in another query (sub - queries)".

Also, just " starting many servers for a problem" due you is it is a good
solution? Shah, my advice is, try to look for alternatives which can solve
your problem and which can execute the queries paralley, for that, i can
give is: ozzie framework. Look into it, it is good. Look at this simple
hive query execution using the ozzie:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10499526/simple-oozie-example-of-hive-query

Kumar

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Bhavesh Shah <bhavesh25s...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello all,
> I am asking you about the increasing the performance of Hive. I tried with
> mappers and reducers but I didn't see difference in execution.
> Don't know why, may be I did in some other way which may be not correct or
> due to some other reason.
>
> I am thinking that Is it possible to execute Hive queries parallelly?
> Means,
> Normally the queries get execute in queue manner.
> query1
> query2
> query3
> .
> .
> .
> n
>
> I am thinking that if we use mapreduce program  in Hive JDBC program, then
> is it possible to execute it parallelly.
> Don't know will it work or not? Thats I am asking you about it.
> But again my questions are:
> 1) If it is possible then may be it require multiple Hive Thrift Server?
> 2) Is it possible to open multiple Hive Thrift Server?
> 3) I think it is not possible to open multiple Hive Thrift Server on same
> port.?
> 4) Can we open multiple Hive Thrift Server on different different port?
>
> Please suggest me some solution to this. If you have other idea other than
> this then pls share with with me
> I will also try that.
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Bhavesh Shah
>

Reply via email to