Arun, I am even more confused now than I was before:
Here you say: > Essentially 'trunk' is where incompatible changes *may* be committed (in >future). We should allow for that. On another thread, responding to Avner (re: MAPREDUCE-4049?) you say, > We do expect 'new features' to make it to trunk before we can commit to >either branch-1 or branch-2. Which one is it ? Do you expect that "new features" will always remain compatible ? - Milind --- Milind Bhandarkar Greenplum Labs, EMC (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of any organization, past or present, the author might be affiliated with.)
