Hey Arun,
Thanks for the clarification. ('tis not pedantic - seems like good practice..)
Jagane
-----Original Message-----
From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:a...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 1:46 PM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0
planned?
Apologies for being pedantic: please set the target-version to 1.0.2. The
committer/RM set the fix-version after it's merged into the release branch.
thanks,
Arun
On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Jagane Sundar wrote:
> Thanks, Eli.
>
> I have uploaded a re-spin of the patch for HADOOP-5836 to the Jira.
> My patch for HADOOP-8136 needs to have this patch for HADOOP-5836 applied
> first. I will mark HADOOP-8136 with fixVersion 1.0.2.
>
> Jagane
> ________________________________________
> From: Eli Collins [e...@cloudera.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:25 AM
> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0
> planned?
>
> Hey Jagane,
>
> You can target your patches against branch-1.0, and then mark them
> with fixVersion 1.0.2 if you'd like the RM to pull them in for the
> next dot release.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jagane Sundar <jag...@sundar.org> wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I would like to make some enhancements to the s3n driver in branch-1.0.
>>
>> Specifically, I would like to accomplish the following:
>> 1. Backport HADOOP-5836
>> 2. Update the jets3t library from 0.6.1 to 0.8.1. This entails code changes
>> in the s3n driver to track API changes in jets3t version 0.8.1. I filed a
>> jira, HADOOP-8136, to track this.
>>
>> The question I have is this - where does it make sense to put these fixes
>> in? Is there a Release 1.1.0 planned? Or is it merely a 1.0.[23] type of
>> change?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Jagane
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
