It would be nicer, if it was written in Java.  I think something wrap
on top of jmdns would be a better fit for Zookeeper.

regards,
Eric

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> There's a long standing "ZooKeeper DNS server" jira which can be found
> here, someone has already created a basic implementation:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-703
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Steve Loughran <ste...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 05/07/11 23:00, Eric Yang wrote:
>>>
>>> In another project, I have implemented a bonjour beacon (jmdns) which
>>> sit on the Zookeeper nodes to advertise the location of zookeeper
>>> servers.  When clients start up, it will discover location of
>>> zookeeper through multicast dns.  Once, the server locations are
>>> resolved (ip:port and TXT records), the clients shutdown mdns
>>> resolvers.  Client proceed to use the resolved list for zookeeper
>>> access.  There does not seem to be cpu overhead incurred by the
>>> beacon, nor the clients.  If a client could not connect to zookeeper
>>> anymore, then it will start mdns resolvers to look for new list of
>>> zookeeper servers.  The code for the project is located at:
>>>
>>> http://github.com/macroadster/hms
>>>
>>> It may be possible to use similar approach for location resolution,
>>> and load rest of the config through zookeeper.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Eric
>>>
>>
>> That's interesting; I think it's more important for clients to be able to
>> bind dynamically than it is for the cluster machines, as they should be
>> managed anyway.
>>
>> When I was doing the hadoop-in-VM clustering stuff, I had a well-known URL
>> to serve up the relevant XML file for the cluster from the JT -all it did
>> was relay the request to the JT at whatever host it had been assigned. All
>> the clients needed to know was the URL of the config server, and they could
>> bootstrap to working against clusters whose FS and JT URLs were different
>> from run to run.
>>
>> zookeeper discovery would benefit a lot of projects
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to