I also have built instrumented cluster and at least no bindings required for system testing are broken. -- Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:51, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tested the RC on a single node cluster, kicked the tires. Looks good. > +1 on its release. > > Regardless of how the RC got here, we only get benefit from releasing > it. It represents a huge chunk of work from our contributors, > provides needed features for our users and moves us one step closer to > making regular releases again. > > -Jakob > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: >> Yup, exactly right - it has been reverted in the trunk as well. Thanks >> for digging this up, Koji! >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:22, Koji Noguchi <knogu...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>>> except >>>>> HADOOP-6386 and HADOOP-6428. >>>> causes a rolling port side effect in TT >>>> >>> I remember bugging Cos and Rob to revert HADOOP-6386. >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6760?focusedCommentId=12867342&; >>> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#commen >>> t-12867342 >>> >>> Koji >>> >>> On 5/2/11 9:43 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <c...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 16:56, Arun C Murthy <a...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On May 2, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On May 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Tom White wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I just did a quick search, and these are the JIRAs that are in 0.20.2 >>>>>>> but appear not to be in 0.20.203.0. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Tom. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did a quick analysis: >>>>>> >>>>>> # Remaining for 0.20.203 >>>>>> * HADOOP-5611 >>>>>> * HADOOP-5612 >>>>>> * HADOOP-5623 >>>>>> * HDFS-596 >>>>>> * HDFS-723 >>>>>> * HDFS-732 >>>>>> * HDFS-579 >>>>>> * MAPREDUCE-1070 >>>>>> * HADOOP-6315 >>>>>> * MAPREDUCE-1163 >>>>>> * HADOOP-5759 >>>>>> * HADOOP-6269 >>>>>> * HADOOP-6386 >>>>>> * HADOOP-6428 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Owen, Suresh and I have committed everything on this list except >>>>> HADOOP-6386 and HADOOP-6428. Not sure which of the two are >>>>> relevant/necessary, I'll check with Cos. Other than that hadoop-0.20.203 >>>>> now a superset of hadoop-0.20.2. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I have looked somewhat more into these two JIRAs and if I remember >>>> correctly >>>> this fix causes a rolling port side effect in TT and it has been reverted >>>> in >>>> 0.20.200 (Y! Fred? release) because Ops weren't happy about this (I am sure >>>> you can check internal Git to cross-verify my recollection). >>>> >>>> Considering above, these might be better left outside of the release and, >>>> perhaps, they should be reverted in trunk as well. >>>> >>>> Cos >>>> >>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> Arun >>>>> >>> >>> >> >
