Owen, Branch naming is fine with me. More importantly, I'm curious what is in each.
To clarify my understanding: 1) Is the tip of the branch-0.20-security supposed to be equal the tip of branch-0.20-security-203? In other words, both branches should differ only in history how they got there, but their content at the end should be identical? They are close, but not the quite the same. About 44 files are different between the two. 2) Is the branch-0.20-security-202 an earlier attempt to contribute the same as branch-0.20-security in a patch-by-patch basis, is superseded by branch-0.20-security-203 and (202) can therefore be abandoned? Or is there still some use for branch-0.20-security-202 separately from branch-0.20-security-203? Thanks, Joep -----Original Message----- From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omal...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 3:29 PM To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Massive checkin to hadoop-0.20-security-patches I'm about to push the broken apart hadoop-0.20-security into hadoop-0.20-security-patches. It is 863 patches for the main branch. There are two release branches off of it that have a few patches each. The version that Arun pushed originally is 0.20.202.X and there is a newer release branch that is 0.20.203.X. The 202 and 203 branches have a few patches each. For now, I propose calling the branches: branch-0.20-security branch-0.20-security-202 branch-0.20-security-203 -- Owen
