> Companies wanting a 1.0 product could always pay Cloudera and get a
v2 product.
lol :) good point Allen, lets please *not* adopt a 1.0 labeling for
Apache Hadoop :)
Seriously though, to avoid my previous comment about 1.0 labeling being
misinterpreted, though I think the 1.0 labeling is important, I think it
is much more *urgent* and *important* to get the release cycle back in
order, which should focus on getting that done first.
-- amr
On 4/1/2010 2:31 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On 4/1/10 2:15 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
<chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
In terms of the significance of the 1.0 labeling, I think it's important for
adoption.
Companies wanting a 1.0 product could always pay Cloudera and get a v2
product. ;)
