On 3/30/10 8:22 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> Another release we might consider is 1.0 based on 0.20. > > It is tempting and I think that 0.20 is *really* our 1.0, but I think > re-labeling a release a year after it came out would be confusing. By "our" do you mean Yahoo!'s or Apache's? The fact that there are a *ton* of admin tool changes/fixes/additions in the Yahoo! Distribution of 0.20 (and quite a few in CDH) should be the big hint that Apache 0.20 is *not* 1.0. I think it would do the PMC well to actually play with Apache 0.20.2 and realize how much is missing vs. their in-house distributions.
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Steve Loughran
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Stack
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Chris Douglas
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Steve Loughran
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Owen O'Malley
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Tom White
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Doug Cutting
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Chris K Wensel
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Owen O'Malley
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Cosmin Lehene
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Allen Wittenauer
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Doug Cutting
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Amr Awadallah
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Doug Cutting
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Konstantin Shvachko
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Tom White
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Doug Cutting
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Konstantin Shvachko
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Andrew Purtell
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Chris K Wensel
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process Doug Cutting