+1 on Sept. 18th freeze date so there is time to get a working flush in 0.21. St.Ack
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze < s29752-hadoop...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I thought only Append needs more time. If Map/Reduce also needs more time, > +1 on Owen's proposal (i.e. everything on Sept 18.) > > Nicholas > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Hemanth Yamijala <yhema...@yahoo-inc.com> > > To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 8:42:11 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21 > > > > Map/Reduce would benefit too from the extended date (Sept 18). I still > > think Owen's latest proposal is more suitable. > > > > Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > > > seems that the Nigel's previous suggestion (i.e. append Sept 18, > others Sept > > 4) is better. > > > > > > For your reference, attached the previous message thread "[VOTE] Push > back > > code freeze for 0.21" at the end . > > > > > > Nicholas Sze > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > > >> From: Nigel Daley > > >> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > >> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 2:23:24 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21 > > >> > > >> +1 > > >> On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> All, > > >>> After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs > more time > > > > >>> > > >> to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze > time of > > 4:30 > > >> pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and > MapReduce. > > >> > > >>> -- Owen > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> From: Eric Baldeschwieler > > >> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 5:11:15 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21 > > >> > > >> AGGHH! > > >> > > >> Let's not push out the general freeze even as far as sept 4th if > > >> possible. I'd suggest oct 31st. If we push out the general freeze > > >> until append is complete, we will delay having a stable release with > > >> append at least an additional month. > > >> > > >> E14 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> From: Nigel Daley > > >>> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:30:55 -0700 > > >>> To: > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> There's a 3rd option I'd support. Feature freeze on Sept 4, except > > >>> for Append which gets a 2 week extension. This allows us to start > > >>> stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up. > > >>> > > >>> Nige > > >>> > > >>> On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty > > >>>> hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be > > >>>> facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we are > > >>>> likely to need more time for the completion of the development of > > >>>> the code & tests. > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09 > > >>>> > > >>>> Konstantin (aka Cos) > > >>>> > > >>>> On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I would like to clarify the append plans. > > >>>>> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about > > >>>>> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design. > > >>>>> This will include all the functionality and unit testing > > >>>>> according to the test plan. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features. > > >>>>> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule. > > >>>>> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than > > >>>>> we predicted :-). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further ahead. > > >>>>> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the > > >>>>> design. > > >>>>> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using > > >>>>> fault > > >>>>> injection, etc. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> --Konstantin > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Amr Awadallah wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 for stable append. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- amr > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman > > >>>>>>> (POWERSET) wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > > >>>>>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omal...@apache.org] > > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM > > >>>>>>>>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21 > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 > > >>>>>>>>> September to > > >>>>>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, > > >>>>>>>>> I'm +1. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -- Owen > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> With best regards, > > >>>> Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos) > > >>>> > > >>>> Yahoo! Grid Computing > > >>>> +1 (408) 349-4049 > > >>>> > > >>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > >>>> Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> ------ End of Forwarded Message > > >>> > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > > >> From: Nigel Daley > > >> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > >> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 2:23:24 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21 > > >> > > >> +1 > > >> On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> All, > > >>> After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs > more time > > > > >>> > > >> to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze > time of > > 4:30 > > >> pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and > MapReduce. > > >> > > >>> -- Owen > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
