There's a 3rd option I'd support. Feature freeze on Sept 4, except for Append which gets a 2 week extension. This allows us to start stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.

Nige

On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:

I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we are likely to need more time for the completion of the development of the code & tests.

+1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09

Konstantin (aka Cos)

On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
I would like to clarify the append plans.
Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
This will include all the functionality and unit testing
according to the test plan.

September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features.
Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than we predicted :-).

So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further ahead.
Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the design. E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using fault
injection, etc.

Thanks,
--Konstantin

Amr Awadallah wrote:
+1 for stable append.

-- amr

Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
+1





On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)<jim.keller...@microsoft.com> wrote:

+1


-----Original Message-----
From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omal...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21

I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.

-- Owen




--
With best regards,
        Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)

       Yahoo! Grid Computing
       +1 (408) 349-4049

2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed


Reply via email to