spmallette commented on code in PR #3483: URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3483#discussion_r3493803976
########## docs/src/dev/developer/for-committers.asciidoc: ########## @@ -672,8 +672,19 @@ TinkerGQL support out of the box and runs these scenarios without any additional * `@InsertionOrderingRequired` - The scenario is reliant on the graph system predictably returning results (vertices, edges, properties) in the same order in which they were inserted into the graph. * `@MetaProperties` - The scenario makes use of meta-properties. +* `@MultiLabel` - The scenario requires a graph that supports multi-label vertices (i.e. +`ZERO_OR_MORE` vertex label cardinality). Providers that only support single-label vertices should Review Comment: is this truly `ZERO_OR_MORE`? like, have we structured it to be only that cardinality? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
