This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jiayu pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/sedona-spatialbench.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 67b6c3f Fix out-of-place statement (#28)
67b6c3f is described below
commit 67b6c3f755ef823a2969e8c3fbed50545b67fea7
Author: Jeff Pettiross <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon Sep 22 16:20:19 2025 -0700
Fix out-of-place statement (#28)
* Fix out-of-place statement
* Undo file rename
---------
Co-authored-by: Jeff Pettiross <[email protected]>
---
docs/overview-methodology.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/overview-methodology.md b/docs/overview-methodology.md
index 8abb466..b7e5577 100644
--- a/docs/overview-methodology.md
+++ b/docs/overview-methodology.md
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ General-purpose analytics query benchmarks don’t cover
spatial queries. They
The analytical benchmarks help analyze analytical performance, but that
doesn’t necessarily translate to spatial queries. An engine can be blazing
fast for a large tabular aggregation and terrible for spatial joins.
-SpatialBench is tailored for spatial queries. It’s the best modern option to
assess the spatial performance of an engine. Let’s take a look at some of the
older spatial benchmarks.
+SpatialBench is tailored for spatial queries. It’s the best modern option to
assess the spatial performance of an engine. Here are some suggestions for how
to use it for the most accurate and fairest results.
## Hardware and software
