SEZ9 commented on issue #12766: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/12766#issuecomment-6621554897
@CryoThrust thanks again for the detailed proposal. The per-instance UGI direction is right, and the option-name and security-mode contract has already been spelled out above, so I won't repeat it here. There's nothing further to settle on our side: please go ahead and open one focused PR linked to this issue. In the PR description, it would help to note which code paths you verified against a real KDC versus with credential-free unit coverage. <!-- streview-comment:2264 --> -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
