DanielLeens commented on PR #13062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/13062#issuecomment-6514191238

   Thanks again for the revision. The CI fact cited previously has changed: the 
current head now has a successful aggregate Build. CI was previously the only 
remaining technical blocker; CI is now passing, so that CI objection is cleared 
and my technical conclusion is ready for maintainer approval. This withdraws 
the earlier request to obtain/adopt a Build for this head. Daniel has READ 
permission, so I cannot represent this clarification as an effective APPROVED 
review; a write-capable maintainer must perform that repository gate.
   
   Snapshot 2026-10-30T03:23:54.079985+00:00: head 
`4eed8722d095483732d889231f8fdd45d8a808a3`; [Signal pull request 
update](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/actions/runs/40918697666/job/123605752949)
 = `SUCCESS`; [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/123682833791) = 
`SUCCESS`.
   
   Base `dev`; comparison `diverged`, ahead 2, behind 3; merge state `blocked`. 
Behind/diverged alone is recorded metadata and does not add a sync request. 
This is an unchanged-head discussion/CI clarification, not a new complete 
source review, an effective approval or a dismissal of historical requested 
changes.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to