DanielLeens commented on PR #11912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11912#issuecomment-6396813814

   Thanks, @SEZ9, for mapping the responses back to your original findings. 
That is useful context for closing your threads: lazy applier construction, 
logical/physical table resolution, identifier safety, the writer contract and 
the paired docs should each be checked against the current head before being 
marked resolved.
   
   I am not adding a second numbered copy of those points or treating this 
acknowledgement as your final review. The check snapshot still has the 
workflow-approval gate rather than a completed required Build result; that 
needs repository-side attention, and is not evidence that the contributor 
should add another source patch. Your thread closeout and final write-capable 
maintainer decision remain separate from this discussion reply.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to