DanielLeens commented on issue #12766:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/12766#issuecomment-6168240886

   Thanks for the detailed report. I checked the current Hudi connector path: 
it has a keytab-login helper that establishes the Hadoop UGI from the supplied 
configuration, and the writer creates the Hudi write client before the failing 
write operation. The current trace reaches the Hudi writer, but it does not 
show enough of the worker-side initialization to distinguish a missing Kerberos 
context from configuration/classloader propagation into the Hudi client.
   
   The fact that the same credentials work with HdfsFile and Iceberg is useful 
evidence, but it is not yet enough to identify the Hudi-specific difference. 
Could you please add the following, with all credentials and host details 
removed:
   
   1. The exact SeaTunnel 2.3.13 distribution/build, Hudi connector plugin/JAR 
version, and deployment mode.
   2. The complete exception chain from the first Hudi initialization failure, 
plus the worker log around keytab login and Hudi write-client creation.
   3. The Kerberos-relevant, sanitized settings from `core-site.xml`, 
`hdfs-site.xml`, and `hive-site.xml`; please do not upload the keytab.
   4. Whether those XML files and the keytab are present and readable by the 
actual worker process user, and whether the failure is cluster-worker-only or 
also reproduces in local mode.
   5. A minimal Hudi-only reproduction if possible, including the Hudi and 
Hadoop dependency versions visible in the worker process.
   
   With that evidence we can trace the UGI/configuration handoff into the Hudi 
client and determine whether this is a connector bug or an environment-specific 
authentication setup problem.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to