JeremyXin commented on code in PR #9446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/9446#discussion_r2154562810
##########
seatunnel-connectors-v2/connector-clickhouse/src/main/java/org/apache/seatunnel/connectors/seatunnel/clickhouse/util/ClickhouseProxy.java:
##########
@@ -429,6 +438,100 @@ public void dropDatabase(String database, boolean
ignoreIfNotExists) {
executeSql(ClickhouseCatalogUtil.INSTANCE.getDropDatabaseSql(database,
ignoreIfNotExists));
}
+ public List<ClickhousePart> getPartList(
+ String database, String table, Shard shard, List<String>
partitionList) {
+
+ String sql =
+ String.format(
+ "select name from system.parts where database = '%s'
and table = '%s'",
+ database, table);
+
+ if (partitionList != null && !partitionList.isEmpty()) {
+ StringJoiner joiner = new StringJoiner("', '", "('", "')");
+ partitionList.forEach(joiner::add);
+
+ sql += " and partition in " + joiner.toString();
+ }
+
+ sql += " group by name";
+
+ log.debug("get part sql: {}", sql);
+
+ try (ClickHouseResponse response =
clickhouseRequest.query(sql).executeAndWait()) {
+ Iterable<ClickHouseRecord> records = response.records();
+ return StreamSupport.stream(records.spliterator(), false)
+ .map(r -> new ClickhousePart(r.getValue(0).asString(),
database, table, shard))
+ .collect(Collectors.toList());
+ } catch (ClickHouseException e) {
+ throw new ClickhouseConnectorException(
+ ClickhouseConnectorErrorCode.GET_PART_ERROR,
+ "Cannot get part name from system.parts",
+ e);
+ }
+ }
+
+ public List<SeaTunnelRow> getDataFromSplit(
+ ClickhousePart part,
+ SeaTunnelRowType seaTunnelRowType,
+ ClickhouseSourceTable clickhouseSourceTable,
+ int offset) {
+
+ long st = System.currentTimeMillis();
+ List<SeaTunnelRow> seaTunnelRowList = new ArrayList<>();
+ TablePath tablePath = TablePath.of(part.getDatabase(),
part.getTable());
+
+ String whereClause = String.format("_part = '%s'", part.getName());
+ if (StringUtils.isNotEmpty(clickhouseSourceTable.getFilterQuery())) {
+ whereClause += " AND (" + clickhouseSourceTable.getFilterQuery() +
")";
+ }
+
+ String sql =
+ String.format(
+ "select * from %s.%s where %s limit %d, %d",
Review Comment:
I forgot this point. Since the part strategy currently only supports the
`MergeTree` table engine, and the `MergeTree` engine must specify the `Order
By` field. Therefore, the above sql adds the `Order By` field of the table to
ensure the Order. If the `Order By` field is empty, the entire part is read
directly. Is this feasible?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
