123123213weqw opened a new pull request, #6386: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-dashboard/pull/6386
@lizhimins Supersedes #5772 (GitHub refuses to reopen maintainer-closed PRs, hence the fresh one) — same one-line ordering fix, with the review asks applied, and the branch merged onto the current `rocketmq-studio`. ## What The route table on the topic page lists `queueDatas` in whatever order the broker's table walk produced, while the queue-stats view on the same screen orders its rows (`orderedBrokerAddrs`, the group/progress sorts). This orders the route rows by broker name so both views agree. ## Review asks from #5772, applied - Test renamed to `getTopicRoutesShouldOrderRoutesByBrokerNameTest` per repo convention. - The "order is not stable" framing is gone — for an identical route the walk is deterministic; the point is consistency with the stats view. `RocketMQMetadataProviderTest` is green on this branch. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
