TickFairy opened a new issue, #7704: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/7704
### Before Creating the Bug Report - [X] I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions). - [X] I have searched the [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues) and [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions) of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate. - [X] I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ. ### Runtime platform environment CentOs 7.9 k8s 1.24 docker 20.10.16 ### RocketMQ version 5.1.3 ### JDK Version _No response_ ### Describe the Bug controller模式 2主4从 切换为1主4从配置从节点因为broker meta 冲突无法加入 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. 启用controller 模式 2. 启动2主4从 broker-0 和 broker-1，两个配置文件只有brokerName的区别 broker-0 主和从的配置文件如下 broker-0.conf ``` brokerIP1=xxxx brokerId=-1 brokerRole=Slave brokerName=broker-0 ``` broker-1 主和从的配置文件如下 broker-1.conf ``` brokerIP1=xxxx brokerId=-1 brokerRole=Slave brokerName=broker-1 ``` 3. 启动后运行正常 4. 调整broker-1.conf的brokerName=broker-0，也就是移除一个主节点将他们都设置为broker-0的从节点，重启后查看broker.log报错 The brokerName: broker-1 in broker metadata is different from brokerName: broker-0 in broker config ### What Did You Expect to See? 启动命令指定了brokerConfig，但contoller没有重新设置brokerId ，而且时报和boker metada冲突，这里broker meta 不会根据brokerconfig更新？ ### What Did You See Instead? - ### Additional Context _No response_ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
