yx-Yaoxaing opened a new pull request, #596: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/pull/596
## What is the purpose of the change Originally, when annotating a class with @Configuration, it couldn't be resolved as a RocketMQ consumer listener class. I changed the way annotations are parsed, allowing classes marked with @Configuration to be correctly identified as RocketMQ consumer listener classes. This is because, in our practice at the company, many people also prefer using @Configuration. ## Brief changelog In the postProcessAfterInitialization() method of the RocketMQMessageListenerBeanPostProcessor message listener post-processor, I changed the annotation processing approach to: RocketMQMessageListener ann = (RocketMQMessageListener) AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(targetClass, RocketMQMessageListener.class); This modification allows both @Configuration and @Service annotated classes to function as consumer listeners. ## Verifying this change In production and actively deployed. RocketMQMessageListener ann = AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(targetClass, RocketMQMessageListener.class); -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
