mxsm commented on PR #5928: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/5928#issuecomment-1406049208
> It seems redundant to maintain documents here and in official sites, what if just refer corresponding sections in official sites? @caigy The official website's documentation is more detailed and there should be corresponding Chinese documentation in the project's documentation as well. As for whether maintenance of documentation is needed in both the official website and the project, my personal opinion is that the community should discuss it. In the past, many design documents were maintained in the project. The official website's documentation, IMO, is more geared towards user guides and some basic concepts. At the same time, the official website maintains documentation for multiple projects in the RocketMQ ecosystem. So, in my personal opinion, it is still necessary to maintain the documentation in the MQ project. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
