Author: orcmid
Date: Fri Jan 15 23:40:22 2016
New Revision: 1724894
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1724894&view=rev
Log:
Report accompanying the tabulation of Bugzilla issues, comments, and rate of
unresolved issues.
Added:
openoffice/pmc/project-state/Current-BZ-OverallActivityReport.txt (with
props)
Added: openoffice/pmc/project-state/Current-BZ-OverallActivityReport.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/pmc/project-state/Current-BZ-OverallActivityReport.txt?rev=1724894&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- openoffice/pmc/project-state/Current-BZ-OverallActivityReport.txt (added)
+++ openoffice/pmc/project-state/Current-BZ-OverallActivityReport.txt [UTF-8]
Fri Jan 15 23:40:22 2016
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+ Originally posted to the d...@openoffice.apache.org list at
+ <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201601.mbox/
+ %3C00aa01d14fca%2422ef9610%2468cec230%24%40apache.org%3E>
+
+SUMMARY
+
+The top-level analysis of Bugzilla issue handling has been completed for all
+issues opened on the project through December 31, 2015.
+
+The complete tabulation is in the PDF document at <http://s.apache.org/YFT>.
+
+It remains the case that since the establishment of Apache OpenOffice as an
+ASF Top Level Project in November, 2012, the accrual of unresolved issues
+exceeds 40%. That is, for every 100 new issues, on the average more than 40
+of them will be unresolved indefinitely.
+
+In contrast, although there is a very large number of unresolved issues that
+remain in the Bugzilla from its history as part of OpenOffice.org, that
+previous technical debt was, proportionally, under 20%.
+
+Some highlights:
+
+ * Even though the monthly rate of new issues and comments on issues has been
+ decreasing significantly since mid-2014, the rate of technical debt as the
+ proportion of unresolved issues has not improved.
+
+ * Although a reduction to 35% unresolved-issue is seen in the last 5 months
+ of 2015, this may be distorted by issues created and then resolved in the
+ staging of AOO 4.1.2 release candidates and QA on the candidates. Results
+ for the first-quarter of 2016 are needed to determine if this is a new trend
+ or a hiccup.
+
+DETAIL AND QUALITY MATTERS
+
+This is a rough analysis, although the consistent trend is difficult to
+explain away.
+
+Refinement requires a closer look at the nature of issues and understanding of
+exactly what resolution means, not just what being left unresolved means.
+
+There is also a suspected disconnect with regard to what is considered an
+issue and how the ways of closing an issue are actually applied.
+
+ * Closing of a new issue as a duplicate qualifies as a resolution. The
+ incidence of long-standing issues that continue to receive duplicate reports
+ is useful to understand in this case, and that requires more detail.
+
+ * Some issues are closed as Resolved Fixed when the fact of the matter is
+ that there was insufficient detail to understand and confirm the issue and
+ the reporting party failed to provide additional information (if it was even
+ requested).
+
+ * Some comments on issues tailgate possibly-different problems onto known
+ ones, although the resemblance may be superficial and the issues need to be
+ split.
+
+ * Enhancement/feature requests are not distinguished.
+
+ * Resolved issues are sometimes closed without obtaining confirmation that
+ incorporation of the identified resolution in distributed code actually
+ addresses the originally-reported difficulty.
+
+ * Some issue reports are closed as not issues because they are declared user
+ problems and kicked to the Community Forum.
+
+These may all have small effects. We will know only by looking more closely
+into Bugzilla details.
+
+The last case deserves more careful attention.
+
+The next-in-line users of Apache OpenOffice distributions consist of around 50
+million users who are mainly individuals and 87% of whom are using Microsoft
+Windows. Such casual users, whatever their limited experience in
+trouble-shooting and describing problems, are the main users of this software.
+The usability issues they encounter are important to the project; even though
+they may not involve bugs in the code, they point to defects in the product.
+Capturing those experiences and recognizing them as real issues for the user
+community is important. That feedback is important for determining and making
+available workarounds and advice. It can also inform changes to the software
+that might ameliorate those difficulties for non-experts. Here's a simple
+example: having an easy-to-use option for resetting the user profile.
+
+FUTURE STEPS
+
+Along with extending the current analysis into the first quarter of 2016,
+exploration of the nature of unresolved and resolved issues will be
+introduced.
+
+
+ - Dennis
+
Propchange: openoffice/pmc/project-state/Current-BZ-OverallActivityReport.txt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
svn:eol-style = native
Propchange: openoffice/pmc/project-state/Current-BZ-OverallActivityReport.txt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
svn:mime-type = text/plain;charset=UTF-8
