patacongo commented on code in PR #6433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/6433#discussion_r1254818887


##########
include/sys/syscall_lookup.h:
##########
@@ -33,13 +33,13 @@ SYSCALL_LOOKUP(gettid,                     0)
   SYSCALL_LOOKUP(getppid,                  0)
 #endif
 
-SYSCALL_LOOKUP(sched_getparam,             2)
-SYSCALL_LOOKUP(sched_getscheduler,         1)
+SYSCALL_LOOKUP(nxsched_get_param,          2)
+SYSCALL_LOOKUP(nxsched_get_scheduler,      1)
 SYSCALL_LOOKUP(sched_lock,                 0)

Review Comment:
   > what' rule to add or not add the nx prefix?
   
   The idea in the naming was to create a separate (but very similar) namespace 
for functions that should be called only within the OS vs. functions that can 
be called only from applications.
   
   Often the nx* named functions and application interface of the same name 
differ only in that the application interface performance application related 
housekeeping like setting the errno value and/or handling cancellation points, 
neither of which apply within the OS.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to