xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #1604:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1604#issuecomment-677634412


   > > Yes, we will make a golden config for test.
   > 
   > Given the number of config variables, and states for those variables and 
dependency, I think we need a **large set of** golden configs (not just one ) 
and tooling to build test a new/deleted config var.
   > 
   
   The golden config is justed for automation test, each arch should have at 
least one config for virtual platform(qemu or sim) and run LTP test suite to 
ensure the basic quality.
   
   > When I am messing with Kconfig I build test all the permutation of the 
settings change. This finds all sorts of subtle problems: like unused vars that 
the codding style tends to cause because we can not define were used.
   > It also finds the C&P errors that are common with N = {1..9} of something.
   > 
   > I want be clear, the build testing has come a long way thanks yourself to 
@btashton @liuguo09 @yamt @lulingar and @patacongo - Thank you all. We just 
need to get better coverage. It would be nice to have this on the road map and 
define some tasks that we can all help with.
   
   Yes, we need extend the build matrix to coverage more combination for build, 
but ranconfig like linux can help a lot:
   https://elinux.org/Ktest


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to