xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #3131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3131#discussion_r2204416105


##########
netutils/dhcpc/dhcpc.c:
##########
@@ -950,3 +968,107 @@ int dhcpc_request_async(FAR void *handle, 
dhcpc_callback_t callback)
 
   return OK;
 }
+
+/****************************************************************************
+ * Name: dhcpc_release
+ ****************************************************************************/
+
+int dhcpc_release(FAR void *handle, FAR struct dhcpc_state *presult)
+{
+  FAR struct dhcpc_state_s *pdhcpc = (FAR struct dhcpc_state_s *)handle;
+  int ret;
+  int send_attempts = 0;
+  const int max_attempts = CONFIG_NETUTILS_DHCPC_RELEASE_RETRIES;

Review Comment:
   My meaning is why not use CONFIG_NETUTILS_DHCPC_RELEASE_RETRIES at line 1014 
directly



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to