cederom commented on PR #3120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3120#issuecomment-3049681459

   > > > @xiaoxiang781216: Before merged, this patch should separate xedge to 
independent project and split one patch to two: one is xedge project and 
another is xedge demo.
   > > 
   > > 
   > > @JorgeGzm: Thank you for the feedback. I understand now that the project 
should be split into two separate patches:
   > > ```
   > > * Xedge Library - The core toolkit as an independent, reusable component 
in **apps/xxx/xedge/**
   > > 
   > > * Xedge Example - A simple demonstration of library usage in 
**apps/examples/xedgedemo/**
   > > ```
   > > 
   > > Before proceeding with the implementation, I have a question about the 
proper location for the Xedge library. Would **apps/netutils/xedge/** be the 
appropriate directory, or would you recommend a different location such as 
**apps/framework/xedge/** ?
   > 
   > @xiaoxiang781216: netutils or system is a good candidate. @cederom what's 
your opinion?
   
   Thanks for asking @xiaoxiang781216 :-) I would go for `netutils` as `xedge` 
is a framework tightly coupled with networking / IoT capabilities while 
`system` is more about "local" system utilities :-)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to