nuttxpr commented on PR #16301: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16301#issuecomment-2846642476
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be expanded for greater clarity. **Strengths:** * **Clear problem description:** The summary clearly explains the race condition and its consequences. * **Solution explained:** The fix is described concisely. * **Testing information provided:** Target architecture, board, and test procedure are included. Reference to related `nuttx-apps` PR is helpful. **Areas for improvement (if applicable to the actual PR content):** * **Missing issue references:** If this addresses a specific NuttX issue, include the link. * **Impact section needs expansion:** While it mentions fixing a test failure, be more explicit. Does this affect end-users? Does the change in critical section holding time have performance implications? Are all architectures affected? Consider adding "NO" to the other impact categories explicitly for completeness. * **Testing logs omitted:** While you mention successful test runs, including snippets of the logs (even abbreviated) would strengthen the PR. This demonstrates the before/after behavior change. * **Build host information missing:** Specify your build host OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version. This aids reproducibility. While the core information is present, expanding on the suggested areas will make the PR easier to review and integrate. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
