nuttxpr commented on PR #16275: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16275#issuecomment-2833594079
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be more explicitly filled out. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change. Adding `sphinx-tags` for better search and filtering is a clear improvement. The examples provided also help understand the practical application. * **User Impact Addressed:** The impact on the user is well-described, highlighting the improved search functionality. * **Testing Explanation:** The testing process is explained, including build methods and verification steps. **Areas for Improvement (to make it even stronger):** * **Explicitly Address All Impact Points:** While the user impact is addressed, the other impact points should be explicitly stated as "NO" or "YES" with explanations, even if the answer is "NO." For example: * Impact on build: NO * Impact on hardware: NO * Impact on documentation: YES (New tags added, new page listing tags, documentation updated to use tags) * Impact on security: NO * Impact on compatibility: NO (Should specify backward compatibility maintained) * Anything else to consider: NO * **Missing Issue References:** If this relates to a specific issue, those references should be included. If not, explicitly state "N/A" for clarity. * **Testing Logs:** While you describe *what* you tested, including actual logs (even if they're short and just show successful builds) would strengthen the PR. Example: ``` Before: [Standard Sphinx build output] After: [Standard Sphinx build output showing tag generation/inclusion] ``` * **Build Host Details:** Be more specific about your build host environment (OS version, compiler version, etc.). This aids reproducibility. Example: `Linux (Ubuntu 22.04), x86_64, GCC 11.2.0` * **Target Details:** If this change affects any specific targets, list them explicitly. If it's general documentation improvement, state something like: "N/A - Documentation change affects all targets." By addressing these minor points, the PR will be even more robust and easier for reviewers to assess. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
