nuttxpr commented on PR #16186: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16186#issuecomment-2796253361
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) This PR appears to **partially meet** the NuttX requirements, but lacks crucial information. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Problem Description:** The summary clearly states the error encountered (`'vendor_specific_module_path' referenced before assignment`). This immediately tells reviewers what the PR aims to fix. * **Error Log Inclusion:** Including the traceback is helpful for understanding the context of the error. **Weaknesses:** * **Missing Explanation of the Fix:** The summary states "fix," but doesn't explain *how* the issue is fixed. What code changes were made to resolve the `UnboundLocalError`? This is the most crucial missing piece. * **Vague Impact Assessment:** "RELEASE" as the impact is insufficient. While it suggests a potential impact on a release, it lacks specifics. Does this fix a critical bug? Does it affect specific architectures or boards? All impact categories (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility) should be explicitly addressed with "YES" or "NO" and a description if "YES." * **Insufficient Testing Information:** "CI" is not enough detail. While Continuous Integration testing is important, the PR should also include specific local testing details. List the host OS, CPU architecture, compiler, target architecture, board, and configuration used for testing. The provided error log seems to be the build error, not a functional test log. Demonstrate that the fix works as intended by providing logs *before* and *after* the change, showcasing the expected behavior. **Recommendation:** To fully meet the NuttX requirements, the PR needs to be revised to include: 1. **Detailed Explanation of the Fix:** Describe the code changes implemented to resolve the `UnboundLocalError`. Explain *why* the original code caused the error and how the change addresses it. 2. **Comprehensive Impact Assessment:** Address all impact categories explicitly. If the answer is "YES" for any category, provide a detailed description of the impact. 3. **Thorough Testing Information:** Provide specific details about the local testing environment (host and target). Include *functional* test logs demonstrating the issue before the change and the correct behavior after the change. Simply relying on "CI" is not sufficient for a proper review. By addressing these points, the PR will provide reviewers with the necessary information to evaluate the changes effectively and ensure the quality and stability of the NuttX project. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
